Sunday, August 23, 2020

Taliesin Massacre

Frank Lloyd Wright is perhaps one of the most famous people from Wisconsin. Today he is known for his marvelous architectural creations. Back in early 1900’s he was known for his philandering ways.

In 1911 he built a mansion for his mistress, Mamah Borthwick Cheney, in Spring Green, Wisconsin.

On August 15th, 1914, tragedy struck the household as everyone sat down for their midday meal. Julian Carlton, a servant at Taliesin took an axe and massacred nearly everyone in the house.

To better understand the mystery behind this story one must first look at the details.

Who was in the house?
Mamah Borthwick Cheney, mistress of the household
John (age 12) Mamah’s son
Martha (age 8) Mamah’s daughter
Julian Carlton, the servant from Barbados, married to Gertrude Carlton
Gertrude Carlton, the cook from Barbados, married to Julian Carlton
Edna Kritz, a neighbor girl and Martha’s friend
Six workmen, Tom Brunker, Billy Weston, Ernest Weston, Emil Brodelle, Herbert Fritz, and David Lindblom, all working on construction designs for Frank

What were the household relationships?
John and Martha were not Frank’s children, but the children from Mamah’s legal marriage to Edwin Cheney.

It is alleged that in July of 1914, Weston and Lindblom were at a tavern where they both stated their dislike for Julian Carlton.

Who was killed when?
First, Julian serves lunch to the six men working for Frank. He then serves lunch to Mamah and her children. He seals the door, blocking the workmen into their room. He then pours gasoline in the hall and lights it. Next, Julian goes over to the room where the family is eating. Mamah and her children were the first to be killed. Each was attacked with an axe. When he has finished killing the family, Julian goes back to the room where the workmen are trapped. He attacks Billy and Ernest Weston, David Lindblom, Emil Brodelle and Herbert Fritz. Herbert manages to escape by tumbling down a hill, though his arm is broken.

Billy Weston, David Lindblom, Herbert Fritz all managed to survive, though Lindblom passed away days later due to his burns. Mamah and her two children all died.

Now here’s where I am a little confused. All of the articles and books I have read say that seven people died in the house; Mamah, her two children, the neighbor girl (some reports neighbor boy), and four of the six workers. (But that adds up to 8? Perhaps they are not counting David Lindblom, because he did not die right away?) They then state that two survived. That would mean that there were eight (or nine) people in the house. However, all accounts state there were a total of ten people in the house, twelve if you include the Carltons.

Julian Carlton only lived for a few weeks after the massacre. In the last few weeks of his life, he never revealed why he did what he did. Some say it might have been racially motivated. Others theorize that it could have been because Julian and Gertrude were fired by Mamah. A few have even argued that Frank paid the Carltons to get rid of his mistress and her children.

You might also be asking where was Gertrude Carlton during the murders. Apparently she was absent from the scene, which leads to more questions. Where was she? Why was she there? Did she know the murders were going to happen? The police decided she didn't know anything about what her husband did, so they released her after a few days in jail.

Sources and Further Readings:

Death in a Prairie House: Frank Lloyd Wright and the Taliesin Murders by William R. Drennan



Friday, August 21, 2020

The Murder of Hae Min Lee

The murder of Hae Min Lee on January 13th, 1999 has gained popularity in recent years from the Serial and Undisclosed podcasts. It’s a true who-done-it case. The convicted killer and Hae’s ex boyfriend, Adnan Syed, pleads his innocence from prison.

In 2014, Sarah Koenig, one of the creators of Serial, investigated the case. She found many issues with both sides of the story.

The facts were simply not adding up, so I decided to do some digging of my own. The three major facts that stuck with me through all of my investigating.

  • Hae not leaving the parking lot after school:
    • Hae must have been stopped before leaving school that day. She was supposed to pick up a family member, and from what I understand, she was a very responsible young woman. It would have had to have been something important to stop her from picking up her cousin on time. What could have stopped her from leaving after school that day?
  • The phone call to Nisha at 3:32 on Adnan’s phone
  • Jen picking up Jay at BestBuy at 8:00:
    • Jen said she pick up Jay at BestBuy at 8:00 that night. How did he get there? According to reports he drove to school that day. Adnan was the one who needed a ride. So where was Jay’s car? Did Adnan have it? If so, why?

Then there is all the incriminating information about Jay. According to reports, Jay told about/showed a friend a dead body. That friend told a neighbor girl, but later changed their story when they found out that Jay was not in jail. My question is what was Jay’s relationship with Hae. How well did they know each other? According to Adnan, the day that Hae was will, Jay wanted to get a gift for his girlfriend. Who was she? Was she Hae or Jen? What was the relationship between Jen and Hae?

From the facts I have been able to come up with two possible theories for what happened that day:

Theory 1:
Jay killed Hae and told Jen. At 3:32 he butt-dials Neisha. He buries her body between 7:09 and 7:16. Jen picks up Jay at the BestBuy at 8:00

Theory 2:
Adnan and Jay killed Hae. At 3:32, Adnan purposely calls Nisha. Together, Jay and Adnan bury Hae at 7:09-7:16. Adnan drops Jay off at the BestBuy and keeps Jay’s car or somehow through the events of the night, they ended up in Adnan’s car.

As you can see, Jay is the main suspect in my opinion. He was the one who pointed the finger at Adnan and gave police the information. Most of the information Jay gave police was accurate, so he had to have been there. Either he killed Hae or he helped cover it up.

To find out what exactly happened, we need to know precisely two things, what cars were where and who was driving what car when. I honestly don’t know if any of my conclusions could be true. It’s very possible that I’m wrong and I certainly don’t want to accuse anyone, especially an innocent person. More work still needs to be done on this case, not just by me, but by the authorities. There is enough there to make any detective worth their snuff question the case. In the meantime….

….Stay Tuned….

Sources and Further Readings:







Thursday, August 20, 2020

The Zodiac Killer

Lately, I have been doing some more research on the Zodiac Killer. The other day, I was flipping through channels and found a documentary series on the Zodiac Killer called “The Hunt for the Zodiac” on the History Channel. (It’s not a great show and I’ve only caught a few episodes. If you’re in for a good laugh, maybe take a look, but I can’t be bothered to do a review on it.)

The episodes I watched were mostly about finding the Zodiac Killer, however, they did talk quite a bit about a case I had never heard of. Because of this, I will be more or less be splitting this story into three parts; a part about the Zodiac calendar, a part about Ross Sullivan, and a part about Donna Lass.

These are a few leads I had never heard of. I’ve done a quite a bit of research on these cases, and like what I have found. I’ve decided my information up into a few different postings, which I’ll be sharing with you all over the next few weeks.

….Stay Tuned….


First, I would like to address that the documentary brought to my attention the Zodiac calendar. This is a calendar that splits the year up into thirteen months based on the moon cycle. The days of the week are also named differently according to this calendar and they do not match up perfectly with our own. For example the first day of the week, according to the Zodiac calendar is “Dali”, but every Dali day is not Sunday, due to the incongruence of the twelve month Gregorian Calendar (the one most often used in the western world) and the thirteen month Lunar cycle/ Zodiac calendar.

The importance of this Zodiac calendar to this case is in fact the Dali day. The symbol for Dali is a circle with a cross at the center. It is the exact same symbol as the one used by the Zodiac. A coincidence? Perhaps. As the Queen of Mystery, Agatha Christie, herself once wrote, every situation is allowed one coincidence.

But when it comes to the Zodiac case and the Zodiac calendar, we have two coincidences. Not only did the Zodiac sign his letters with the Dali day symbol, but all of his known killings happened on Dali days. Yes, that’s right, all four known attacks were committed on Dali days. From what I understand, all the other crimes listed in my previous posting about the Zodiac Killer were committed on Dali days.

Could this just be another coincidence? Personally, I think not. The Zodiac was not just some crazy lunatic. I think he was more of a true “lunatic”, if you look at the historical definition. Lunatic come from the term “lunar” meaning moon. Lunatic meant someone whose madness was driven by the moon. I think in the Zodiac’s warped perception of reality, there is a connection to the moon and the lunar cycle. I think he was cold and calculated in all the crimes he committed. He knew what he was doing and that’s what makes him so horrifying.

Because of this new information, I would like to edit what I initially said about the killer in my profiling. I don’t think he ever stopped killing. He just didn’t feel the need to draw attention to himself anymore. They only reason he began contacting the police was for the thrill, and when that thrill went away, he allowed himself to disappear back into obscurity.

….. Stay Tuned (for Part 2)....

Sources and Further Reading:



http://www.dictionary.com/browse/lunatic


Next up is the documentary’s outing of of Ross Sullivan as being a new Zodiac Killer suspect. Again, I’m not saying he did it. I’m just saying repeating some information that’s out there.

According to the documentary, he matched the physical description and looked like a picture of the killer. Sullivan also worked at a library and studied ciphers. He was suspected of murder in a completely separate case.

The murder that he was suspected in what that of Cheri Jo Bates. Back on October 30th of 1966 Bates was attacked just outside of the Riverside City College Library. And just like the Zodiac killings a few years later, the killer wrote a letter to the newspaper admitting to the killings.

He signed his name “Z”.

Sullivan was allegedly a student at Riverside City College at the time of the murder, but does that mean he’s connected to Bates’ murder? Who can really say. To me, he looks like the sketch, but so do a lot of people (including Ted Cruz). I’ve done some research on Sullivan’s personal life and found a nice timeline that I’ll link below, but not much else. Everything says that he died back in 1977. At one point, his brother referred to him publicly as a “schizophrenic” and I don’t know if that’s a fit for the Zodiac. I’m not a mental health professional, but from what I understand of schizophrenia, people fall into fits of delusion and madness. Hollywood has portrayed people with schizophrenia as crazed killers, but in reality, that couldn’t be further from the truth. I see it as being too difficult for a person with schizophrenia to be as focused as the Zodiac Killer. People with schizophrenia might believe some odd delusions, but from what I understand it is usually too difficult for them to follow through with these delusions in a big way. A person with schizophrenia might think their neighbor is tapping their phones, so they might be paranoid. What they wouldn’t do is fashion themselves into a killer that has to kill people on certain day of the week using an archaic calendar and a creating impossible cyphers. Sullivan could have been the killer. It was strange that he had ties to both cases, but, again, many people were tied to the Zodiac case.

I will say that I do think Cheri Jo Bates’ Killer was the Zodiac. There are too many coincidences there, mostly when considering the letters that were written. The only thing that gives me pause, is that October 30th, 1966 was not a Dali day on the lunar calendar.

….. Stay Tuned (for Part 3)....

Sources and Further Readings:



http://zodiackillerciphers.com/wiki/index.php?title=Ross_Sullivan


Zodiac Killer Documentary: Part 3
Donna Lass was a woman who went missing back on September 6th, 1970. She had

Lawrence Kane: He worked with a woman named Donna Lass. She went missing on September 6th, 1970.

According to the Zodiac 13 month calendar, the first day of each week is called “Dali day” The symbol for that day is the symbol the Zodiac Killer used. (A circle with a cross through it.) All of the Zodiac victims were attacked on a Dali day…. and so was Donna Lass.

Larry Law was also a suspect in the Donna Lass case. She had lived with him and his wife just before she disappeared. Law also knew Kane. Law traveled south from Lake Tahoe to San Francisco once to twice a month to visit his mother.

Sources and Further Readings:


Wednesday, August 19, 2020

The Missing Ruby Slippers

Many of us here in the states have seen the 1939 film, The Wizard of Oz. The love for The Wizard of Oz is especially true in Grand Rapids, Minnesota, which just happens to be the birth place of Judy Garland.

Back in 2005, a pair of Judy Garland's beloved ruby slippers were stolen. And what happened to them? No one really knows. People have searched for years. Some say the slippers were sold on the black market. Other's say that they are at the bottom of a lake. Who knows? Maybe the thief took them to Oz.

What I do know, is that who ever solves this case, will receive $1 million in reward money. So please, if you have any information on the slippers, contact your local law enforcement. Together we can bring these slippers home.

....Stay Tuned....



Sources and Further Reading:
http://www.startribune.com/what-a-world-what-a-world-stolen-ruby-slippers-still-missing-from-minnesota-s-judy-garland-museum/397525721/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/arts-and-entertainment/wp/2015/07/12/the-mystery-of-dorothys-missing-ruby-slippers-solve-it-and-youll-get-1-million/?utm_term=.a4c938eb79dc

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruby_slippers

Tuesday, August 18, 2020

Baby Angel of Winona

For most, bringing a child into the world is the greatest joy in life. But not for the parents of Baby Angel.

On September 5th, 2011, the body of an infant baby girl was found in the Mississippi River just outside of Winona, Minnesota. The baby was found with four angel statues, which led to her being called "Baby Angel." The new born was also found wrapped in an old t-shirt and placed in a bag embroidered with the word "Manzanillo." Finally, the Baby Angel was also found with a piece of jewelry containing a evil eye charm.

According to law enforcement, many attempts have been made over the years to identify the baby, but all results have led no where.

Possible Meanings Behind Objects:
In the research I have done, I found that the one of the angles was inscribed with the latin phrase, "2000 Anno Domini." (Aka "the year 2000 A.D.") Because of the latin phrase, I have concluded that the four angels are meant to represent the four archangels in Catholicism. This also ties with the evil eye charm, which is sometimes used as a means of protection by some Catholics.

The race of the baby angel is unknown, although DNA testing has been done. The significance of the t-shirt and bag are also unknown. Although, the bag is believed to be from the Mexican city of Manzanillo.

Possible Connecting Cases:

It is possible that this case could be connected with the three infants found on the Mississippi River in Goodhue County, Minnesota. In that case, the first infant, of white race, was found in 1999 wrapped in a blanket. The second baby, of white race, was found four years later in 2003 and was wrapped in a blanket. The third baby, intensified as being Native American, was found in 2007. Finally, Baby Angel was found in 2011. DNA testing shows that the first and second babies are biologically related.

If you do the math, a baby was found, deceased, once every four years. Thankfully, no body was found in 2015, four years after Baby Angel. The officers in Goodhue County and Winona County have worked together and doubt that the Baby Angel case is related to the Goohue County cases. However, I believe it is still a possibility.


I must also address the case of Debbie Wolfe, a North Carolina woman who was found dead in a pond in 1985. I doubt that her case and Baby Angel's case are related, however they were both found with an evil eye charm. According to my research, Debbie's family believes that their loved one was murdered, but the local police department disagrees.


If you have any information about the Baby Angel case, please contact Ron Ganrude at the Winona County Sheriff's office or Crime Stoppers at 507.457.6530.

....Stay Tuned....

Monday, August 10, 2020

Disappearance of Susan Ledyard

The Victim: 
Susan Ledyard of Wilmington, Delaware was a joyful and enthusiastic spirit that cared for both animals and children. She had been a teacher at the local high school. She was on summer break back in July of 2019 when she went missing. 

The Death:
On July 23, 2019, Susan sent her last text at 2:54 am to her friend or one of her sisters. From what I have been able to dig up in my research, the texts had been friendly and carried a happy tone to them. At 3:02 am, Susan's car was seen leaving her house.
    The next morning Susan's car was found at the Brandywine River and and at 7:30 am her body was found 3 miles down stream from her car. Sounds like a tragic case of suicide, right?
    Detectives said due to the shallowness of the water, she had not gone in the water near where her car was found (meaning the water was not deep enough for a body to have floated the three miles down river to where she was found). Her death was ruled a murder due to blunt force trauma to the head.

The Questions:
  • Susan's husband stated that he last saw his wife sitting on their front porch before going to bed. If someone else had entered their home and taken Susan, why did he not hear anything? Why hasn't he been more involved in finding her killer? Why has everything I have seen online been from Susan's sister?
  • If Susan had taken her own life, why didn't she leave a note? Why didn't she walk the mile to the river? How did her body float down the river that quickly?
  • How do the  police know exactly what time her car left her house? How do they know for sure this wasn't a suicide? What aren't they telling us?
For more on this case...

...Stay Tuned...

https://www.delcotimes.com/news/what-happened-to-susan-morrissey-ledyard-mystery-of-death-of-academy-park-teacher-continues/article_64a39f5a-ceb6-11ea-9a82-a7e137eb1e83.html?utm_content=fb-delcotimes&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=socialflow&fbclid=IwAR1Hm5kyLyfIUA1YR7jMKJoKdpf4xg09i1HJ8c5xZ6HLgvqt8ODx2QyT53M





Sunday, August 9, 2020

The Suspicious Sleuth and the Murder of John Zera

I like to think of myself as an armature detective. The wonderful followers of this blog know how much I love a good mystery. I like analyzing the possibilities of a situation. Daniel Acker claims to be a person just like me. He says he loves solving crimes and mysteries.

Perhaps he does like mysteries. Perhaps he is also interested in hauntings and the supernatural. Perhaps he didn't kill little Johnny Zera. Maybe he was just curious. Maybe that's why he contacted Johnny's family... Maybe that's why he created a mini version of their police department and littered his minature town with mini flyers of missing and murdered children... Maybe the diary in which he confessed to multiple murders was a prank...

John Zera went missing on February 20th, 1976 near Milwaukee, Wisconsin. His body was found days later beaten to death. Daniel Acker was a swim coach at John’s high school and after the boy’s death, Acker became close with the Zera family.

In later years, in 2009 a man contacted the school where Daniel Acker worked, stating that Acker molested him when he was in middle school. The school contacted the police, and the police decided to search Acker’s property. Everything was fine until they look in the one place most Hollywood villains keep their secrets; the basement.

In Acker’s basement, police found toy police cars and a replica of the police station. You’re probably thinking, “Ok, yeah. That’s a little weird for a grown man to have, but not that bad. I mean it’s not like he had miniature pictures of missing boys posted on the wall of the mini police station…” No you’re right, most of the children on the walls of the replica police station were murdered, not missing. The last two children listed were John Zera and Carl Galbraith, a young boy who was murdered near Kenosha, Wisconsin in 1977. Then to top it off, the police found a diary, written by Acker in which he confesses to killing John Zera.

Acker was arrested in 2009 for sexual assault of another young boy. Although Acker denied ever knowing John Zera, while in custody confessed to assisting around 20 young boys over the years. The police do not think that he killed Zera. It is possible that Zera could have been killed by Michael Uporsky, a teacher at Zera’s school, or James Lee Crummel, a child serial rapist and murderer from California. There is even the theory that John Wayne Gacy, the infamous killer clown of Chicago, killed Zera and Carl Galbraith.

In 2016, DNA from Zera’s case was tested. However, the test results were inconclusive. From what I understand the investigation into Daniel Acker has stopped...

For updates on this case
…Stay Tuned…

Sources and Further Readings:

Unsolved Podcast (Season 1)



“5 Unsolved Mysteries with Strange Written Clues Part 2” video by Criminally Listed, YouTube




Saturday, August 8, 2020

Alias Grace: The Facts

If you've been bingeing content on Netflix I have been, you might have come across a miniseries title "Alias Grace." This miniseries is based on Margaret Atwood's novel of the same name. Atwood's novel, A Handmaid's Tale, has been a fairly recent hit on Hulu. Sadly, I have not been able to watch A Handmaid's Tale because let's be real... it's too real; also who pays for Hulu Plus? However, I did read the book a few years ago and loved it. It's a great science fiction novel and a fairly quick read. 

Alias Grace on the other hand, is a bit of a different story. Like the murder case itself, Alias Grace is anything but straightforward. Don't get me wrong, it's a great read and I loved every minute of it. It's just taking me awhile to get through due to the "thinkyness" of the prose.

Anyway, you're not here for a review. You're here for the murder.

On July 28th, 1843, Grace Marks and her lover, James McDermott, murdered their employer, Thomas Kinnear, and his lover/housekeeper, Nancy Montgomery. Or at least that's what everyone thinks happened.

The Facts:
-Nancy, Grace, and James were all employed by Thomas Kinnear
-Thomas died to multiple gunshot wounds
-Nancy was beaten with an axe, strangled, and finally dismembered in a bathtub
-James and Grace ran off to Toronto, where they were apprehended on their way to New York.
-The two were arrested and began to incriminate each other.
-Both were sentenced to death by hanging on November 3rd, 1843.
-James was put to death on November 21st, 1843, while Grace's sentence was commented.
-Grace was sent to an asylum, where she was deemed a "lunatic" by the state.
-Finally, Grace spent the rest of her days in prison.

I struggle with condemning Grace Marks and James McDermott. I do not see any direct evidence in either of them committing the murders. During the trial, they accused each other of having committed the murders, but I have no idea under what state their confessions were taken.

In my opinion, the killer clearly had hatred towards Nancy Montgomery. There was such overkill in her case that the killer must have had some sort of motive to want her dead. During the trial, it was stated that Grace was jealous of Nancy and her relationship with Thomas. I could see this as a motive, but there is no direct evidence showing that Grace wanted an intimate relationship with her employer. If Grace felt so snubbed by Thomas, why didn't she find a new position elsewhere?

I don't see James committing the murders either. He told police that Grace made him do it and it is not unheard of for a woman having one lover kill another. Still something about this case doesn't quite sit right with me. I suppose I will just have to keep an eye on this case.


...Stay Tuned...



Sources and Further Reading:

Alias Grace by Margaret Atwood**** READ IT, SOOOO GOOD, (but will take you a  month to get through)

https://archive.org/details/cihm_67883

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grace_Marks

http://murderpedia.org/female.M/m/marks-grace.htm

http://www.thewhig.com/2012/07/03/murderess-or-pawn

http://www.nytimes.com/1996/12/12/books/did-she-or-didn-t-she-a-tale-of-two-murders.html






****I will not be writing a formal review for Alias Grace, but I do highly suggest reading it!

Friday, August 7, 2020

The Croydon Poisonings

The Setting: 
Late 1920s Surrey, England.  
 
The Victims:
Edmund Creighton Duff, Died April 27, 1928. Had fallen ill after going fishing and then eating supper on April 26. Originally ruled natural causes. Later found to be poisoned by arsenic.

Vera Sydney, Died February 16, 1929. Had fallen ill after eating lunch on the 14th. Later found to be poisoned by arsenic.

Violet Sydney, Died March 5, 1929. Had fallen ill after eating lunch. Was concerned about the abnormally gritty texture of her tonic prescribed by Dr. Nothing found to be wrong with tonic. Death ruled suspicious, either murder or suicide. 
 
Background:
Violet Sydney was left a single mother after her husband abandoned her and her three children, Vera, Grace, and Thomas. Grace later married Edmund Creighton Duff, a man of many failed investments,  and had four children. Thomas married Margaret, an educated American and had two children. Vera, Grace, and Thomas were left an inheritance from a wealthy aunt in the years preceding the murders. It has been alleged that Vera was the only sibling with any of the inheritance left just prior to the murders.


Possible Solutions:
The Mad Maid/cook- I doubt this as a likely outcome. She tried the soup that Vera had eaten and also gave some to the household pet. Both became ill and she threw it out.

Crazed Doc- It has been alleged that he developed a blood lust. There is no evidence for this.

Grace Sydney- Treated as the main suspect by the police for the rest of her life, Grace Sydney is an obvious suspect. Her husband had led them to ruin due to his bad investments. It has been alleged that Grace killed her husband to stop the bad investments. She then killed her sister in order inherit her money and limit the divide of the inheritance from their mother. Finally, she killed her mother in order to inherit her money. She could not kill Thomas, because the money would have gone to his wife and children and then she would have had to have killed all of them.

Thomas Sydney- Julian Fellowes, of Downton Abbey fame, believes that the most likely murderer is Thomas. He was a failed musician and was in desperate need of money. Fellowes alleges that his wife was about to leave him due to their financial circumstances. It has been alleged that Thomas killed Edmund as practice, or for the fact that he didn't much care for his brother, or to lay a foundation to blame his sister. He then killed Vera, in order to gain her inheritance, and finally then killed his mother. It is also alleged, much like with Grace, that he did not kill his final sister, because the money would have gone to her children and he would have had to kill them as well.

IMHO: Most sleuths argue that this murder has the most simple answer; Grace wanted her husband out of the picture and the family money. For me, I would need to know how intelligent Grace and Thomas were. If Thomas was cunning, then it had to be him. If Grace was stupid, then it would have been her. The death of Edmund is key here. Grace would have had to have known that the police would have been immediately drawn to her as a suspect after the death of her husband. It would have been smart for Thomas to kill Edmund first; pointing suspicion away from himself and towards the only other surviving family member. It is also suspicious to me that Thomas' branch of the family was the only one left untouched by poison. Matriarch; dead. Vera; very single and very dead. Grace; lost her husband and put into even more financial ruin. This really is a tough case and without more evidence, it's hard for me to say.

...Stay Tuned...



Further Readings:

Julian Fellowes Investigates Episode 4 




Thursday, August 6, 2020

Secrets of the Congdon Mansion: A Book Review

Let me first begin with this writer, Joe Kimball. He has two other pen names, J.A. Konrath and Jack Kilborn. I find it odd that a writer feels the need to have three different names, especially three names that feel so similar. It just feels weird, especially since none of these are well known names.

The book is written rather poorly. There was even one point where the narrator changes suddenly. For the most part the book is omniscient third person, but then all of a sudden it will change to first person. For example:

“Police checked out that room, too. And they checked the Holiday Inn Airport South in Bloomington, where the couple stayed for several nights after the funeral.
At each place, police found evidence that firmed up the case against the Cadwell's. It was enough, they believed, to link Roger to the murder.
My colleagues and I covering the case for the Minneapolis Tribune discovered much of this evidence, too. And even though police still maintained publicly that it was a botched burglary case as ate as July 5, we prepared a story for the July 6 editions naming Roger Cadwell-- Miss Congdon’s son-in-law-- as the chief suspect,” page 13.

I had to read that page multiple times to try to see what the author was trying to say, and I still don’t fully understand. There hadn’t been a single place where the author mentions he’s a journalist or that he had colleagues working on this case. It was just a mess.

He also tries to be humorous in his book, which just makes the text sound childish. For example on page 79 he writes, “And after his suicide, I decided that if Roger was capable of committing such violence on himself, he was capable of doing it to others, particularly if he was drunk.” I take so many issues with that statement. First, suicidal does not equal homicidal. Yes, I think Roger committed the murder, but I would not use his suicide as proof of his violence. Second it that last bit of the sentence; the drunk part. This blog has moments like this, but usually only when I’m writing about something outrageous (see “Living with the Dinos” or “Bigfoot in Fort Snelling State Park”). The Congdon Mansion murders were by no means outrageous; they were shocking and horrific. Kimball tries to make light of this horrificness which is in poor taste. However if dark humor is your thing, to be brutally honest, he’s not very funny either.

Even the cover of this book is ridiculous. It claims to be a “LONG-TIME BESTSELLER”, but I highly doubt that. The cover photos are even fuzzy, making it hard to see the faces of the killers and Elizabeth Congdon. Oh and the color scheme is terrible.

Secrets of the Congdon Mansion is one of those books where you have to ask how it got published. I’m assuming it was self published and self edited. I would compare it to a so-bad-it’s-good movie, but those you can at least appreciate when you’re drunk. (See that is an appropriate time to make a drunk joke.)

.....Stay Tuned.....

Sources and Further Readings:
Secrets of the Congdon Mansion by Joe Kimball (a.k.a. J.A. Konrath, a.k.a Jack Kilborn)

Tuesday, August 4, 2020

Minnesota's Oldest Murder Mystery: A Book Review

This book is so terrible that I am actually unable to get excited about it. It's not even so bad it's good.... it's just bad.

Brueggemann has so many random asides that the book feel is like a rant. For example, he goes into detail about Irish history and the history of Fort Snelling. I can forgive the tangent about the history of the Fort but, both topics have little to do with the murder of John Hays.

I even take issue with the little title of the book. First, it implies that there weren't any murders in Minnesota before that of John Hays in 1839. As I have reported earlier, John Smith was murdered at Fort Snelling in the 1820s. Some might argue that John Smith was technically murdered in what was called "Minnesota Territory" instead of just "Minnesota". Well, I say, "Tomato, tomato; John Smith was killed in Minnesota." And the murder of John Smith is probably not the only murder to happen in the area which we now call "Minnesota." People forget that native tribes have lived on this land for ten thousand years. Within that time, I'm positive that at least one person committed murder.

The second issue I take with the title is that Brueggemann calls it a "mystery." There is no mystery; we know who killed John Hays. In fact, Brueggemann names the killer in the ^%$#ing prologue. Edward Phelan killed John Hays. End of story.

My advise for you all it to skip this book and go read a real mystery, like Nancy Drew.


..........Stay Tuned..........


"Further Reading"? (But really don't do it!)
Minnesota's Oldest Murder Mystery by Gary Brueggemann